Welcome Visitor
Fri, Oct 24, 2014
107 members currently online.

McCaskill demands answers on allegations of whistleblower retaliation at Veterans Administration
McCaskill demands answers on allegations of whistleblower retaliation at Veterans Administration

U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill

WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 20, 2014) — U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Financial & Contracting Oversight, today called for swift action and requested additional information from the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) on its investigation of whistleblower retaliation by Veterans Affairs employees. OSC is currently investigating 37 cases of whistleblower retaliation at the VA.

“As you know, the federal government relies on whistleblowers to report government waste, fraud, abuse, and the mismanagement of taxpayer dollars,” wrote McCaskill, a longtime advocate for stronger whistleblower protections. “Their protection is not only mandated by law but also necessary to ensure the successful oversight of government affairs.  I therefore request that you take prompt action in investigating and adjudicating these cases and that you keep me apprised of any developments that might arise.”

McCaskill requested the information from OSC to determine the scope of the retaliation problem and protect future whistleblowers.

McCaskill also asked OSC to identify the number of whistleblower retaliation complaints brought to OSC by VA employees related to the VA waiting list issues, the number of complaints by worksite location, the number of managerial employees implicated by multiple complainants, the number of SES employees accused, the number of complainants who asked the VA Inspector General to investigate alleged retaliation, and the number of claims that have been resolved and what disciplinary or administrative actions were taken.

Earlier this week, McCaskill used a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing to call for expanded whistleblower protections for intelligence contractors—to better protect those who blow the whistle on waste, fraud and abuse in the intelligence community. She also recently introduced bipartisan legislation to bolster the independence of the National Security Agency’s Inspector General—in part by requiring the office to conduct annual reviews of whistleblower protections for agency employees and contractors, and provide recommendations to improve those mechanisms.

Click HERE to read highlights of McCaskill’s fight for stronger accountability in Washington.

McCaskill’s letter to the Office of Special Counsel appears below:

_____

June 19, 2014

The Honorable Carolyn Lerner
Special Counsel
U.S. Office of Special Counsel
1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218
Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 

Dear Ms. Lerner:

I understand that OSC is currently investigating at least 37 cases of whistleblower retaliation by VA employees who allege that they were reprised against for reporting lengthy waiting times, abusive scheduling practices, and substandard patient care.   As you know, the federal government relies on whistleblowers to report government waste, fraud, abuse, and the mismanagement of taxpayer dollars.  Their protection is not only mandated by law but also necessary to ensure the successful oversight of government affairs.  I therefore request that you take prompt action in investigating and adjudicating these cases, including working with the VA to provide interim relief, and that you keep me apprised of any developments that might arise.

In addition, to assist the Subcommittee in its oversight of the VA, I request that you provide the following information: 

1.      The total number of whistleblower retaliation complaints brought to OSC by VA employees related to lengthy waiting times, abusive scheduling practices, or practices which may have risked the health of patients;

2.      A breakdown of the number of complaints by worksite location;

3.      The number of managerial employees who are implicated by multiple complainants;

4.      The number of SES employees that are accused of whistleblower retaliation;

5.      The number of complaints where the wrongdoing reported by the complainant has been confirmed, and the actions taken with respect to the individual(s) involved in the wrongdoing;

6.      The number of complaints of retaliation that have been resolved and the actions taken with respect to the complainant and the employee against whom retaliation was alleged; and

7.      The number of complainants who have disclosed to OSC that the complainant had asked the VA Office of Inspector General to investigate either the reported wrongdoing or the alleged retaliation prior to making an official complaint to OSC.

I request that you provide the information that you are able to share at this time in a briefing for Subcommittee staff as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday, July 3, 2014.  I also request that you update this information as you are able on a rolling basis going forward. 

Click here to follow the Pulaski County Daily News on Twitter
Click here to follow the Pulaski County Daily News on Facebook


Printer-friendly format



Login and voice your opinion!
Do you know someone else who would like to see this?
Your Email:
Their Email:
Comment:
(Will be included with e-mail)
Secret Code

In the box below, enter the Secret Code exactly as it appears above *


 


Most-viewed
recent articles

**EDITORIAL:** Stay alert to OPSEC on social media (2165 Views)
Massive SWAT team response to strip club justified by armed bikers, sheriff says (1204 Views)
'After Dark' strip club owner charged with possessing cow drugs (997 Views)
Drunk dad wrapped his infant son "burrito" style in bedclothes before his death, St. Robert police say (877 Views)
Late night raid on strip club nets multiple arrests (802 Views)
Baby dies in Norvi Apartments; father tased, then arrested on unrelated warrants (542 Views)
Public Facilities Advisory Board OKs $238,000 Bales Construction bid (518 Views)
Some businesses find new quarters after St. Robert fire (422 Views)
Burned St. Robert shopping center must be demolished (374 Views)
County to COAD: You need to find a new facility (318 Views)